Anybody who has been found manipulating data has damaged their reputation and their chances of getting future grants. Real science is self-correcting like that.
Lol, uh huh sure.
You don't remember the Karl study.
In the summer of 2015, NOAA scientists published a study (“the Karl study”) that retroactively
altered historical climate change data, which resulted in the elimination of a well-known
climate phenomenon known as the “climate change hiatus.” The hiatus was a period
between 1998 and 2013 where the rate of global temperatures growth slowed. This fact has
always been a thorn in the side of climate change alarmists, as it became difficult to
disprove the slowdown in warming.
The Karl study refuted the hiatus and rewrote climate change history to claim that warming
had in fact been occurring. The Committee heard from scientists who raised concerns
about the study’s methodologies, readiness, and politicization. In response, the Committee
conducted oversight and sent NOAA inquiries to investigate the circumstances surrounding
the Karl study.
I like my guns like Obama likes his voters. Undocumented and unregistered.